Google Assistant’s Retention of Voice Recordings Violates IL Biometric Law, Class Action Says
Last Updated on July 19, 2019
Morales et al. v. Google.com, Inc. et al.
Filed: July 15, 2019 ◆§ 2019CH08309
A class action out of Illinois claims Google's retention of voice recordings by users and anyone near a Google Assistant-enabled device violates the state's biometric privacy law.
Illinois
Google is on the receiving end of a proposed class action lawsuit filed by consumers who allege the search giant’s retention of voice recordings created by anyone who happens to speak near a device equipped with Google Assistant violates the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA).
Filed in Cook County Circuit Court, the case explains Google Assistant is akin to “smart” voice-based applications such as Amazon’s Alexa and Apple’s Siri. According to the lawsuit, more than one billion Google Assistant-capable devices have been sold as of January 2019.
In an effort to improve its voice and speech recognition technology, Google, the lawsuit says, retains “every voice recording created by the user and any individual who happens to be speaking near the Google Assistant device.” Google keeps not only the initial question or command uttered by the user, the case says, but also follow-up statements or questions. Google Assistant also listens to and records what people say even when no trigger words are spoken, the suit claims, noting that Google has recently revealed that it employs contractors to listen to consumers’ voice recordings.
The complaint argues that consumers’ voiceprints constitute biometric data under the BIPA, which requires companies to adhere to strict information retention schedules and develop written data retention, dissemination and destruction policies, among other mandates, when collecting and storing biometric identifiers. From the complaint:
“When companies like Google decide to collect, capture, purchase, receive through trade or otherwise obtain a person or customers’ biometric identifier or biometric information, it must first:
- Inform the subject or the subject’s legally authorized representative in writing that a biometric identifier or biometric information is being collected or stored;
- Inform the subject or the subject’s legally authorized representative in writing of the specific purpose and length of term for which a biometric identifier or biometric information is being collected, stored, and used; and
- Receive a written release executed by the subject of the biometric identifier or biometric information or the subject’s legally authorized representative.”
According to the plaintiffs, Google “disregards these statutorily imposed” regulations in failing to inform proposed class members that their biometric information is being collected and/or stored, as well as securing written releases to do so.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.