GM Failed to Warn that Flex Fuel Cars Can’t Run On Only E85, Class Action Claims [DISMISSED]
Last Updated on February 14, 2023
Fleury v. General Motors LLC
Filed: July 26, 2022 ◆§ 1:22-cv-03862
General Motors faces a class action over its alleged failure to disclose that its Flex Fuel vehicles cannot regularly operate on 85-percent ethanol (E85) fuel alone without damage.
Illinois
February 14, 2023 — General Motors E85 Flex Fuel Lawsuit Dismissed
The lawsuit detailed on this page was dismissed without prejudice by a federal judge on February 1, 2023 due to the plaintiff’s failure to state a claim.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
In a 15-page order, United States District Judge Virginia M. Kendall found that the plaintiff failed to identify any false or deceptive statement by General Motors that claimed that Flex Fuel vehicles can run exclusively on 85-percent ethanol (E85) fuel without damage. Judge Kendall stated that the only representations the plaintiff relied upon before buying his car were the E85 window sticker and an online ad relaying that the vehicle had “E85 FlexFuel capability.”
“Stating that Flex Fuel vehicles can run on E85—and even encouraging such use—does not contradict the truth that using E85 exclusively may cause damage,” Judge Kendall wrote.
Judge Kendall also took issue with the fact that the plaintiff did not allege that he read the owner’s manual before buying his 2016 Chevy Impala. Rather, the plaintiff relied on an “E85” window sticker and an online advertisement stating that the Impala had “E85 FlexFuel capability” before purchasing his car, which the judge said are neither false nor deceptive representations because they do not suggest that the vehicle could run solely on E85.
Further, Judge Kendall disputed the plaintiff’s argument that GM’s nondisclosure is “unscrupulous and unethical” and “presents a safety hazard” given that “the fact that exclusive use of E85 can damage Flex Fuel vehicles appears knowable, and the risk of harm, avoidable.”
The judge relayed that the GM owner’s manual mentions potential problems that could arise should a driver exclusively use E85, and the company’s service bulletin instructs authorized dealers to warn against excessive use of E85, “as occurred here when [the plaintiff] experienced car trouble.” Moreover, the judge wrote that the plaintiff could have asked the dealer more about what “E85 FlexFuel capability” meant before buying the car.
Finally, Judge Kendall said the plaintiff’s breach of express warranty claim is “untimely and must be dismissed” because it fails to comply with a four-year statute of limitations. The plaintiff’s 2016 Impala was delivered to its first private owner in June 2016, and the man filed the lawsuit in July 2022.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
General Motors has been hit with a proposed class action over its alleged failure to disclose that its Flex Fuel vehicles cannot regularly operate on 85-percent ethanol (E85) fuel alone without damage.
More specifically, the 18-page case says that GM does not inform vehicle owners that they must alternately fill their cars with E85 and gasoline. Although GM shares warnings in a vehicle’s owner’s manual with regard to lower mileage for E85 fuel and the incompatibility of E85 with low temperatures, the automaker is mum regarding the consistent use of E85, the lawsuit relays.
According to the suit, internal GM documents state that “excessive use of E85” may cause an internal fuel pump plunger to stick, which, in turn, can cause a sudden lack of power and require costly repairs. The filing claims that GM has known of the problems linked to exclusive E85 usage since at least 2016, as evidenced by several technical service bulletins.
“This issue is not disclosed to consumers, who find out about the problem when it occurs,” the case says. “If the person is operating the vehicle on the highway at the time it occurs, it is a significant safety hazard.”
General Motors represents to the public that its Flex Fuel vehicles can “run on E85 ethanol, gasoline, or any combination of the two,” the suit stresses. According to the complaint, E85 sold earlier this year for about $1.50 to $2 less per gallon than gasoline, and Flex Fuel vehicles are more valuable than comparable vehicles that run on only gasoline, per the case.
The lawsuit argues that GM’s claim that its Flex Fuel vehicles can “run on E85 ethanol, gasoline or any combination of the two” negates any requirement that ethanol and gasoline must be used alternatively.
The case says that the owner’s manual for the plaintiff’s used 2016 Flex Fuel Chevy Impala includes no warning about alternating between E85 fuel and gasoline, or filling up with gasoline every other tank or every third tank, to prevent damage. Moreover, the owner’s manual states that “[t]he use of E85 or FlexFuel is encouraged when the vehicle is designed to use it,” which the complaint argues is “flatly contrary to the proposition that frequent use of gasoline is necessary.”
According to the filing, the plaintiff, an Illinois resident, began using E85 fuel regularly when the price of gasoline increased in 2022. In April, the plaintiff’s check engine light came on and the vehicle lost power, the case says.
When the plaintiff brought his vehicle in for repair, he learned that its fuel pump needed to be replaced, the suit continues. Per the complaint, the dealer asked the plaintiff if he was using E85, specifically if he had mixed it with gasoline. When the plaintiff shared that he had been using E85 exclusively, he was informed that he should have been alternating with gasoline between fill-ups, the lawsuit says.
After failing an emissions test this summer, the plaintiff learned that his vehicle would need a new mass air flow sensor due to the fuel pump problem related to his exclusive use of E85, the complaint relays.
The lawsuit looks to cover all persons with an Illinois address who bought a new or used GM Flex Fuel vehicle within the last three years.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.