‘German Five’ Facing Yet Another Antitrust Class Action Case
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Leiser v. BMW AG et al.
Filed: September 25, 2017 ◆§ 9:17-cv-81067-WPD
A proposed class action case details an alleged two-decade-long conspiracy between German car makers to keep prices artificially inflated.
BMW AG BMW of North America, LLC Volkswagen AG Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. Audi AG Audi of America, Inc. Audi of America, LLC DR. ING. H.C. F. Porsche AG Porsche Cars North America, Inc. Bentley Motors Limited Daimler AG Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC Mercedes-Benz U.S. International
Florida
From Florida comes the latest proposed class action lawsuit alleging the “German Five” automakers—Audi, BMW, Daimler (Mercedes Benz), Porsche and Volkswagen—were the cogs in a conspiratorial wheel aimed at keeping competition to a minimum and keeping vehicle prices artificially high.
“This case follows stunning revelations of a decades-long conspiracy where the ‘German Five’ carmakers held themselves out to be fierce competitors, but in reality were functioning as divisions of a single massive company, agreeing on nearly every aspect of the creation of their cars, unbeknownst to the millions of consumers who thought they were the beneficiaries of innovation and competition,” the 51-page complaint starts off.
At the heart of the lawsuit is not the alleged conspiracy itself, however, but its alleged overall scope, the lawsuit says, adding that the saga of the “German Five” must now focus on determining precisely how much money was “deceitfully taken from loyal car customers.”
The complaint speaks of “more than 1,000 meetings involving hundreds of employees” wherein the defendants allegedly coordinated illegal agreements and working relationships. Engrained in the allegations is the much-publicized “Diesel-gate” conspiracy, as well as claims that the defendants, for example, refused to compete on the car speeds at which a mechanized convertible top could operate.
Another example of the defendants’ alleged anti-competitive cooperation with each other, the case continues, is the supposed coordination of the size of tanks for AdBlue, a urea mixture the complaint says is used to split nitric oxide into its components of water and nitrogen to cut down on the amount of pollution emitted by vehicles. This deal was a cost-saving measure, the lawsuit claims, which ultimately had the negative effect of the tanks not being able “neutralize the amount of pollution that was required by law” and necessitated a workaround when the time came for emissions testing.
The entire complaint is worth a read and can be read below.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.