German Automakers Named in Another Lawsuit Alleging Antitrust Conspiracy
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Fong v. Audi AG et al.
Filed: October 4, 2017 ◆§ 3:17-cv-05733
Thirteen German automakers have been named as defendants in another proposed class action accusing them of engaging in 'a two decade-long conspiracy' to hinder technological innovation and the raise the prices of five German car brands.
BMW of North America, LLC Volkswagen AG Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. Audi AG Audi of America, Inc. Audi of America, LLC DR. ING. H.C. F. Porsche AG Porsche Cars North America, Inc. Daimler AG Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC Mercedes-Benz U.S. International Bayerische Motoren Werke AG Mercedes-Benz Vans, LLC
California
Thirteen German automakers have been named as defendants in another proposed class action accusing them of engaging in “a two decade-long conspiracy” to hinder technological innovation and the raise the prices of five German car brands – Audi, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Porsche, and Volkswagen. The defendants are listed as follows:
- Audi AG
- Audi of America, Inc.
- Audi of America, LLC
- Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
- BMW of North America, LLC
- Daimler AG
- Mercedes-Benz USA
- Mercedes-Benz U.S. International
- Mercedes-Benz Vans, LLC
- Dr. Ing. h.c.F. Porsche AG
- Porsche Cars of North America, Inc.
- Volkswagen AG
- Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
The allegations date back to a report released on July 21, 2017 by German publication Der Spiegel in which Volkswagen reportedly admitted it had participated in the anticompetitive scheme. The suit alleges that the defendants engaged a total of at least 200 employees over the years in “working groups” during which they shared business secrets and conspired together to suppress competition among each other. “Working group meetings established rules,” the complaint reads, “specifying that no one manufacturer could be so far ahead in terms of innovations that it would cause another to lose sales.” The case claims that as a result, the defendants delayed technological advances and forced consumers to pay a higher price for their vehicles.
Among the topics discussed between the defendants, the suit says, was decreasing the size of AdBlue tanks – parts involved in diesel vehicles’ emission systems – to save money and allow for more cargo space while evading U.S. emissions regulations. The complaint claims the defendants’ “coordinated approach” attempted to avoid raising suspicions about why companies’ AdBlue tanks could be different sizes while still meeting emissions standards.
The suit argues that the ultimate consequence of the defendants’ behavior is that consumers were forced to pay more for German vehicles than they would have if the automakers were properly competing.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.