GC Services Limited Partnership Missed Mark in Collection Notice, Lawsuit Says
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Geisinsky v. GC Services Limited Partnership
Filed: October 24, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-06190
A NY plaintiff claims GC Services, in a collection notice, failed to 'clearly and unambiguously' convey the full amount of debt owed.
New York
A New York consumer’s proposed class action against GC Services Limited Partnership claims the company failed to clearly and unambiguously convey the amount of debt owed from the perspective of the “least sophisticated consumer.” The complaint argues the amount of debt listed by the defendant does not make it clear that it’s the actual amount of debt due, since GC Services’ request for a “Minimum Payment Due” may lead the plaintiff to believe the balance is not static and may have already been altered. Moreover, the defendant’s “Minimum Payment Due” failed to note whether that amount already included accrued interest and other charges, the lawsuit says.
In sum, the case charges the defendant’s “Minimum Payment Due” could “mislead the least sophisticated consumer into believing that payment of the amount stated will clear his or her account.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.