Frontwave Credit Union Hit with Class Action Over Allegedly Unauthorized Overdraft Fees
by Erin Shaak
Ward-Howie v. Frontwave Credit Union
Filed: June 17, 2022 ◆§ 3:22-cv-00890
A proposed class action claims Frontwave Credit Union has assessed unlawful overdraft fees on transactions that did not actually overdraw customers’ accounts.
California
A proposed class action claims Frontwave Credit Union (FCU) has assessed unlawful overdraft fees on transactions that did not actually overdraw customers’ accounts.
At issue in the 16-page case are what the complaint describes as “authorize positive, purportedly settle negative” (APPSN) transactions. Per the suit, these types of transactions are initially authorized by the credit union into positive funds but settle into a negative balance days later as a result of intervening transactions that purportedly deplete an account’s funds.
According to the case, FCU fails to disclose in its account documents its practice of assessing overdraft fees on APPSN transactions and instead states in “plain, clear, and simple language” that it will only charge an overdraft fee when an account contains insufficient funds to cover the transaction at issue.
The lawsuit says Frontwave Credit Union has injured its customers “to the tune of millions of dollars bilked from their accounts in violation of their agreements with FCU.”
Per the case, there should always be sufficient funds in a customer’s account to cover APPSN transactions because FCU sets aside those funds when the transaction is initially authorized and makes them unavailable for the customer’s use. Despite putting the funds on hold, however, FCU fails to use those same funds to settle APPSN transactions, the lawsuit says.
The case claims FCU instead uses a “secret posting process” during which it releases the hold placed on APPSN transaction funds “for a split second” in the middle of the night and then re-debits the transaction a second time.
“This secret step allows FCU to charge OD Fees on transactions that never should have caused an overdraft—transactions that were authorized into sufficient funds, and for which FCU specifically set aside money to pay,” the complaint states. “This discrepancy between FCU’s actual practices and the contract causes accountholders to incur more OD Fees than they should.”
The lawsuit argues that FCU is not authorized to charge overdraft fees on APPSN transactions given the credit union states in its account agreements that it will only charge overdraft fees when a customer does not have enough money in their account to cover a transaction “but FCU pays it anyway.”
The case looks to represent Frontwave Credit Union checking account holders who, during the applicable statute of limitations period, were charged overdraft fees on APPSN transactions on a Frontwave checking account.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.