Frontline Asset Strategies, Velocity Investments Sued for ‘False Threat’
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Williams v. Frontline Asset Atrategies et al
Filed: July 13, 2017 ◆§ 2:17-cv-03119-JD
A Pennsylvania consumer's class action claims Frontline Asset Strategies and Velocity Investments made unlawful threats in a collection notice.
Pennsylvania
A Pennsylvania consumer claims Frontline Asset Strategies and Velocity Investments, LLC should be held responsible for making the “false threat” that non-payment on his debt may cause the balance to increase, a possible Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) violation.
The plaintiff claims a dunning letter sent to him by the defendants clearly stated that the law limits the statute of limitations during which a consumer can be sued over a debt. The dunning notice, however, allegedly did not inform the plaintiff that partial payment on his balance would restart the clock on the statute of limitations, the suit claims. Further still, the case argues that although the dunning notice said Velocity Investments will choose not to sue the plaintiff, the company could not, in fact, sue the man over his obligation.
“Accordingly, [the defendants’] letter is false, deceptive, and misleading in violation of the FDCPA,” the case reads.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.