Forster, Garbus & Garbus Failed to Disclose Written Debt Dispute Requirement, Lawsuit Alleges
by Nadia Abbas
Last Updated on November 9, 2018
Nussenzweig v. Forster and Garbus LLP
Filed: November 5, 2018 ◆§ 3:18-cv-15677-MAS-LHG
A proposed class action out of New Jersey federal court accuses Forster, Garbus & Garbus of miscommunicating a consumer’s debt dispute rights.
A proposed class action out of New Jersey federal court accuses Forster, Garbus & Garbus of miscommunicating a consumer’s debt dispute rights.
The case focuses on an August 2018 collection letter sent to the plaintiff concerning a debt purportedly owed to Discover Bank. The suit says the notice was deceptive in that it failed to disclose that a consumer’s dispute must be submitted in writing. Additionally, the case claims the letter falsely implied “that the writing requirement is voluntary.”
“As a result of Defendant’s false statements, Plaintiff effectively waived his rights to this statutorily available information because he was not properly informed of the ‘G-Notice’ requirements set forth in the [Fair Debt Collection Practices Act],” the complaint charges.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.