Five 2021 Mazda Vehicle Models Burn Excessive Oil Due to Defect, Class Action Says [UPDATE]
Last Updated on September 4, 2024
Farina v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. et al.
Filed: January 28, 2023 ◆§ 3:23-cv-00050
A proposed class action claims five different 2021 Mazda vehicle models leak engine oil due to a valve stem defect.
North Carolina
September 3, 2024 – 2021 Mazda Oil Leak Settlement Provides Valve Stem Seal Replacements, Reimbursement for Drive
A settlement has been reached in litigation over an alleged valve stem seal defect plaguing certain 2021-2022 Mazda vehicle models, with eligible drivers slated to receive free repairs, reimbursement for out-of-pocket costs, and warranty extensions, among other benefits.
The official Mazda valve stem oil leak settlement website can be found at MazdaValveStemSealSettlement.com.
The deal, which was preliminarily approved by the court on March 11, 2024, covers all individuals and entities in the United States who are current or former owners and/or lessees of a 2021-2022 Mazda CX-30, 2021 CX-5, 2021 CX-9, 2021-2022 Mazda3, or 2021 Mazda6 vehicle equipped with a 2.5L turbocharged engine with the affected valve stem seals.
To check whether your Mazda vehicle is covered by the settlement, input the car’s VIN into the VIN lookup tool on the official settlement website. More than 86,000 Mazda vehicles are covered by the settlement, according to court documents.
To file a claim for settlement benefits, head to this page and enter your Mazda’s VIN and the unique ID and PIN found on your class action settlement notice. The deadline to file a Mazda valve stem settlement claim form is October 19, 2024.
Eligible Mazda drivers whose vehicles displayed “Low Engine Oil Level” before the regular oil change interval of 7,500 miles or one year or who had to refill their engine oil before the regular oil change interval can receive a free replacement of the affected valve stem seals in their covered vehicle at an authorized Mazda dealership. Class members whose vehicles did not display these low oil level symptoms can visit an authorized Mazda dealer for a free excessive oil consumption test and have their vehicle repaired if it fails. The deal allows for eligible class members to receive loaner cars, subject to dealer availability, while their Mazda undergoes repair.
The settlement also provides for all eligible Mazda vehicles an extension of the automaker’s powertrain limited warranty from 60 months/60,000 miles to 84 months/84,000 miles, whichever comes first.
Further, class members can file a claim for reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred for an oil change performed “more frequently than the normal interval of 7,500 miles or 1 year,” and/or additional engine oil bought in between the normal interval of 7,500 or one year.
Notably, the plaintiff in the Mazda lawsuit detailed on this page, which is separate from the case that settled, has filed an objection to the settlement and the motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses and service awards for the class representatives. In his objection, the plaintiff took issue with the apparent lack of proposed settlement benefits for damage to the emissions systems in class members’ vehicles and relief afforded under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
The objector noted to the court that Mazda has set aside nearly $103 million for “estimated costs of complying with environmental regulations,” namely the Clean Air Act, yet this reserve fund, the plaintiff said, “is clearly intended only for CAA fines, and not to benefit any class members” whose Mazda emissions systems, due to the valve stem seal defect, have been processing three to four times the carbon that they were engineered to handle.
“This is clearly a material item to Mazda and there is no disclosure,” the objection documents state. “In fact, the proposed Guthrie settlement is completely silent as to the environmental issues the defect caused and as to any remedying of overtaxed emissions components like the Catalytic Convertor in class vehicles[.]”
The objector also noted that the proposed settlement fails to disclose that the extended powertrain warranty coverage excludes affected emissions components, “including, ironically, the valve stem itself,” which are not part of a vehicle’s powertrain.
A final approval hearing is scheduled for September 16, 2024. It is typically after a settlement receives final approval from the court, and any appeals or objections are resolved, that benefits begin to be distributed to class members. Updates on the case will be posted on the official settlement website.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
A proposed class action claims five different 2021 Mazda vehicle models leak engine oil due to a valve stem defect.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The 21-page suit says the defect plaguing the vehicles—the 2021 Mazda CX-30, CX-5, CX-9, Mazda3 and Mazda6—causes the cars to consume an excessive amount of engine oil in between regular oil changes and creates an increased risk of engine failure, among other problems. Per the case, the defective Mazda valve stems seals allow engine oil to leak into a vehicle’s combustion chamber, making it difficult for drivers to maintain proper engine oil levels and leading to higher carbon emissions.
The plaintiff, a North Carolina attorney and certified public accountant, claims dealership defendant Keffer Mazda and other dealers are “actively conspiring” with the automaker to hide the “true nature” of the “known, dangerous” defect from the public.
An engine’s valve stem seals control oil consumption and lubricant in an engine by allowing a specific amount of oil inside the valve stem as it moves. According to the lawsuit, dealer-generated data shows that Mazda has acknowledged internally that some of the vehicles at issue consume excessive amounts of engine oil, a purported “symptom” of the alleged valve stem problem. One technical service bulletin in particular, from November 10, 2020, instructed dealers to measure a vehicle’s oil consumption after driving 1,200 miles and that “[n]o repair is necessary” when a car consumes less than one liter of oil within that mileage range, the suit says.
However, the Mazda owner’s manual and warranty advise that the recommended oil service interval for the 2021 vehicles at issue is “the earlier of 10,000 miles or one year,” the case states.
“Thus, according to Mazda, a vehicle needs to consume more than eight quarts of engine oil between recommended oil change intervals in order to necessitate a repair for excess oil consumption,” the filing relays, contesting that “[t]here is nothing normal or expected about this rate of oil consumption.”
From there, service bulletins in October and November 2021 expanded upon the apparent oil-burning issue, offering special instructions to dealers for customers who come in with low engine oil-level concerns, the complaint shares.
To date, the suit relays, Mazda has not provided dealers with an adequate repair procedure for the valve stem defect, which the case says “could be caused by premature valve guide wear or seals that are improperly installed.”
The lawsuit stresses that oil consumption is a well-known creator of harmful emissions into the atmosphere, as oil that enters a combustion chamber burns with fuel and is then pushed out with exhaust gases. The case alleges that Mazda, in obtaining the requisite authorizations to sell the 2021 vehicle models in the United States, failed to disclose that the cars would consume seven to eight times the amount of oil they should, “nor have they come clean since.”
The lawsuit looks to cover all consumers in the U.S. who are current or former owners and/or lessees of the 2021 Mazda CX-30, CX-5, CX-9, Mazda3 or Mazda6 vehicles that were subject to a December 2021 technical service bulletin, which include the following:
“2021 Mazda3 (Japan built 2.5T) with VINS lower than JM1BP******403639 (produced before September 14, 2021);
2021 Mazda6 (2.5T) with VINS lower than JM1GL******618910 (produced before September 15, 2021);
2021 CX-30 (2.5T);
2021 CX-5 (2.5T) with VINS lower than JM3KF******472325 (produced before September 14, 2021);
2021 CX-9 (2.5T) with VINS lower than JM3TC******541071 (produced before September 14, 2021).”
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.