FDCPA Class Action Filed Against Mercy Health Saint Mary's, NPAS
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Montoya v. Trinity Health-Michigan dba Mercy Health Saint Marys et al
Filed: November 14, 2016 ◆§ 2:16-cv-14054-GCS-MKM
Mercy Health Saint Mary's and NPAS, which manages the former's revenue cycles, are the defendants in a class action.
Mercy Health Saint Mary’s and NPAS, which manages the former’s revenue cycles, are the defendants in a class action claiming the entities engaged in a pre-collect “flat-rating” scheme to intentionally misrepresent to consumers that they were in fact debt collectors.
The case alleges NPAS sends “pre-collect” letters in an attempt to induce payment from debtors. Even though NPAS sends the pre-collection letters, it is Mercy Health to which debtors must make payments, something that is never made explicitly clear to the unsophisticated consumer, according to the suit.
A debt collection agency is prohibiting from flat-rating, which the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) outlines as the furnishing of any collection form knowing that said form would create the false belief in a consumer that any party other than a creditor is participating in the collection of a debt when in fact no other party is involved other than the debt collector. The lawsuit claims the defendants failed to provide an FDCPA-required mini-Miranda notice clearly stating that they were debt collectors attempting to collect a debt and that any information provided by the debtor would be used for that purpose.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.