Fair Collections & Outsourcing Misled Consumer Regarding Time-Barred Debt, Lawsuit Alleges
by Nadia Abbas
Last Updated on January 18, 2019
Brooks v. Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc.
Filed: January 9, 2019 ◆§ 2:19cv141
Fair Collections & Outsourcing faces a lawsuit that alleges the company misled a consumer as to his time-barred debt.
Pennsylvania
Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc. is the defendant in a lawsuit that alleges the company offered a consumer a settlement option without disclosing that partial payment would alter the legal status of his time-barred debt.
Filed in Pennsylvania, the proposed class action focuses on a letter sent to the plaintiff in March 2018 concerning supposedly overdue rent in the amount of $6,559.12. The letter allegedly listed two settlement offers of $2,623.65 paid either as a lump sum or in several installments. The suit claims the defendant failed to notify the man that the debt’s statute of limitations would restart should he choose the installment option. From the complaint:
“In fact, had Plaintiff chosen to make several payments over time, and advised Defendant of this in writing, the partial payment would revive the statute of limitations rendering the Plaintiff worse off than if he had rejected the offer.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.