Enhanced Recovery Company Sued Over Alleged Ambiguity Regarding Creditor’s Identity
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Rottenstein v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Filed: October 27, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-08297
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC is facing a proposed class action accusing it of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by failing to clearly identify a consumer’s creditor.
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC is facing a proposed class action accusing it of violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by failing to clearly identify a consumer’s creditor. The plaintiff, a New York woman, says she received a collection letter from the defendant that specified her “Creditor” as Barclays Bank Delaware without indicating whether the entity is her current creditor.
On top of that, the suit says the letter also identified “Barclays Rewards” as the plaintiff’s “Original Creditor,” which it argues is “neither a bank nor a lender of money.”
“It is unclear,” the complaint reads, “if Barclays Bank Delaware is a different creditor from Barclays Rewards and who the current creditor is.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.