Enhanced Recovery Company Failed to Name Current Creditor, FDCPA Complaint Alleges
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Rottenstein v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Filed: October 27, 2017 ◆§ 7:17-cv-08297-NSR
A debt collection lawsuit alleges Enhances Recovery Company failed to denote the plaintiff's current creditor in a mailed collection notice.
A Rockland County, New York resident claims in a proposed class action that a collection notice she received from defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC (ERC) unlawfully failed to identify her current creditor. According to the complaint, the notice in question merely stated “Creditor: Barclays Bank Delaware” without indicating whether “Creditor” refers to the original creditor or—if the account was sold off and bought—the current creditor. The case, citing potential Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) violations, says the notice defined the original creditor as “Barclays Rewards,” which the plaintiff argues is neither a bank nor a lender of money.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.