Enhanced Recovery Company Failed to Name Consumer’s Original Creditor, Lawsuit Claims
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Stoessel v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Filed: November 9, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-06561
A consumer in New York claims Enhanced Recovery Company did not properly disclose his original creditor as required by law.
A proposed class action filed in New York claims Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC mailed the plaintiff a collection notice in which the debt collector falsely stated the Brooklyn man’s original creditor. According to the 12-page complaint, the defendant listed the plaintiff’s original creditor as “Upromise MasterCard,” an entity the case says is neither a bank nor lender of credit. Further, the lawsuit says the defendant’s November 2016 collection notice stated “Creditor: Barclays Bank Delaware” without indicating to the plaintiff whether Barclays is the man’s original or current creditor.
“A debt collector has the obligation not just to convey the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed, but also to convey such information clearly,” complaint asserts. “Mere allusions to the creditor’s identity are insufficient. The letter must specifically and clearly identify the creditor of the collection account.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.