DraftKings Failed to Pay Out Certain Fantasy Sport Contests After Suspension of Bills-Bengals Game, Class Action Claims [DISMISSED]
Last Updated on April 24, 2024
Turley v. DraftKings Inc. et al
Filed: January 9, 2023 ◆§ 1:23-cv-10054
A class action alleges DraftKings failed to pay out certain National Football League daily fantasy sports contests after the Buffalo Bills-Cincinnati Bengals game was suspended on January 2 of this year.
Massachusetts
April 24, 2024 – DraftKings Lawsuit Filed Over Bills-Bengals Contest Cancellations Dismissed
The proposed class action lawsuit detailed on this page was dismissed on April 5, 2024.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
In a 17-page order filed on March 29 of this year, U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs granted DraftKings’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint after finding that the company did, in fact, act in accordance with its own rules.
Although DraftKings canceled its Showdown and Flash Draft contests several days before the NFL officially canceled the Buffalo Bills-Cincinnati Bengals game on January 5, the company’s terms of use states that it reserves “the right to cancel contests at any time,” the order relays.
“The Court finds that, regardless of when DraftKings announced their cancellation, DraftKings was within its reserved right to cancel the Showdown and Flash Draft Contests,” Judge Burroughs wrote.
The judge also found that the plaintiffs did not experience actual injuries. Instead, Judge Burroughs determined, they merely alleged that they suffered hypothetical damages, given that their potential winnings were not guaranteed at the time of cancellation and depended on future actions by the NFL and/or DraftKings.
The one-page dismissal order can be found here.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
A proposed class action alleges DraftKings failed to pay out certain National Football League (NFL) daily fantasy sports (DFS) contests after the Buffalo Bills-Cincinnati Bengals game was suspended on January 2 of this year.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The 32-page case explains that DraftKings, the self-described “industry leader” in DFS contests, offers competitions for NFL matches in several formats, or “games styles,” that participants can enter to win cash prizes. Since statistics accrued during NFL games directly affect the outcome of DraftKings’ contests, each game style has policies that determine how the company will pay out contest winners should a game get suspended, shortened, canceled, postponed or rescheduled, the suit relays.
On January 2, the NFL suspended the Buffalo Bills-Cincinnati Bengals game after Bills safety Damar Hamlin collapsed on the field and went into cardiac arrest with 5:58 minutes remaining in the first quarter. The suit alleges that rather than follow its own rules for each game style, DraftKings instead “arbitrarily” offered payouts to customers who led in certain contests, while canceling and refunding entry fees for other contests.
According to DraftKings’ terms of use, “[e]ach Contest or promotion [offered by DraftKings] is governed by its own set of official rules.” Additionally, identical rules for several NFL game style contests, such as NFL “Classic” and NFL “Showdown,” state that “[i]f the NFL declares a game ‘suspended’ then the statistics generated before the game is suspended will count in Game Sets containing said game,” the suit shares.
However, in a January 3 email to contest participants, DraftKings announced that “… entries for Showdown and Flash Draft contests will be canceled and refunded,” adding that “Classic set contests, such as Sunday-Monday slates, will be paid out with current, accrued points,” the case explains.
“Despite DraftKings’s rules sharing the same language across multiple fantasy football game styles, including the Showdown and Classic game styles, DraftKings has chosen to treat them differently, in plain violation of the terms and rules it itself created,” the complaint argues, claiming “hundreds, if not thousands, of participants in these contests were entitled to winnings at the time the game was suspended.”
The plaintiff, a New York resident, claims he was in first place in DraftKings’ “NFL Showdown $20K Two Point Conversion [$5K to 1st] (BUF vs CIN)” contest, and his winnings totaled $5,000 at the time the Buffalo Bills-Cincinnati Bengals game was suspended. The man also claims that he was ranked second in the “NFL Showdown $15K Four-Point Stance [Single Entry] (BUF vs CIN)” contest, and his winnings totaled $3,000 before Hamlin’s injury stopped the game.
The case contends that DraftKings unlawfully canceled the plaintiff’s contest entries. Although his entry fees were refunded, the plaintiff has not received the $5,000 winnings or $3,000 winnings to which he was entitled, the complaint claims.
The lawsuit looks to represent anyone in the United States who entered a Showdown or Flash Draft contest offered by DraftKings, which included the January 2, 2023 NFL game between the Buffalo Bills and Cincinnati Bengals, and to whom the contest indicated winnings were owed at the time the game was suspended.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.