Debt Collector Forster & Garbus Pinged in Class Action Case
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Maymi v. Forster & Garbus, Llp
Filed: December 27, 2017 ◆§ 2:17cv7540
Forster & Garbus is the defendant in a class action claiming the debt collector failed to explicitly identify the creditor who's owed payment.
Forster & Garbus, LLP is the defendant in a proposed class action filed by a New York consumer who claims the company mailed him a collection notice in which it failed to explicitly and clearly convey the name of the creditor to which payment is owed. The complaint asserts the mere statement in the notice of “Re: Barclays Bank Delaware” unlawfully fails to indicate whether the entity refers to the account owner, the plaintiff’s current or original creditor, or the institution to whom the man’s debt is owed. Moreover, the lawsuit argues the defendant’s letter, sent in September 2017, also does not indicate who placed the plaintiff’s account with Forster & Garbus, nor does it state who the defendant represents. Such conduct, the lawsuit alleges, violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), as the least sophisticated consumer “would likely be deceived in a material way by the letter.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.