Debt Collector Fairfax Servicing Accused of Leaving Ambiguous Phone Messages
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Reizes v. Fairfax Servicing, LLC
Filed: November 3, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-06411
Fairfax Servicing, LLC is facing a New York man’s claims that the company violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by failing to clearly identify itself in messages it left on his answering machine.
Note: This case was dismissed without prejudice in February 2018.
Fairfax Servicing, LLC is facing a New York man’s claims that the company violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by failing to clearly identify itself in messages it left on his answering machine. According to the complaint, Fairfax Servicing called the plaintiff several times and left messages urging him to call back regarding “important and confidential information.” The suit argues that the communications were either pre-recorded or pre-scripted and failed to identify Fairfax as a debt collector attempting to collect a debt, an alleged violation of the FDCPA.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.