‘Current Balance’ Questions Come Up in Class Action Against Transworld Systems
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Danyarov v. Transworld Systems Inc.
Filed: December 27, 2017 ◆§ 1:17cv7530
Transworld Systems allegedly stated a current balance without clarification, a move the suit says can be interpreted to mean the amount may change.
Transworld Systems Inc. is the defendant in a lawsuit seeking class action status in which the plaintiff claims he received a collection notice that violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). According to the lawsuit, Transworld’s notice stated a current balance without any further clarification, a move the complaint states can reasonably be interpreted by the plaintiff to mean the amount was subject to change.
“[The plaintiff’s] account was not subject to the accrual of interest,” the lawsuit reads, “but by stating a ‘Current Balance,’ [the defendant] falsely suggested that immediate payment of the balance would benefit [the plaintiff] by implying that the balance would be subject to change, and could be subject to additional interest."
The case charges a debt collection letter that can be read as having two or more meanings concerning the true balance owed, with one of said interpretations being incorrect, is a violation of the FDCPA.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.