Convergent Outsourcing Facing FDCPA Case
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Shpetehaib v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Filed: February 1, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-00579
In a proposed class action lawsuit, a New York man claims defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).
In a proposed class action lawsuit, a New York man claims defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) in a communication sent for a debt reportedly owed to Sprint. The plaintiff claims he was sent a collection notice from the defendants that stated there were “3 CONVENIENT WAYS TO PAY” his obligation. Though the letter did contain mandatory validation language, the lawsuit says, it allegedly lacked “transitional language” that explains how the defendant could simultaneously demand payment AND make a settlement offer without overriding the plaintiff’s right to dispute or demand validation of the debt.
“[The plaintiff’s] validation rights were effectively overshadowed because [the defendant] demanded payment without sufficiently communicating to [the plaintiff] that he has the right to dispute the debt,” the lawsuit asserts.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.