Consumer Claims Debt Collector Falsely Implies Unlimited Fees
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Pinckney v. Berks Credit & Collections, Inc.
Filed: April 25, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-02456
Berks Credit & Collections, Inc. is the defendant in a proposed class action that alleges it used a 'false, deceptive and misleading representation' to collect a debt.
Berks Credit & Collections, Inc. is the defendant in a proposed class action that alleges it used a “false, deceptive and misleading representation” in its attempt to collect a debt. The plaintiff claims she received a letter from the debt collector that failed to identify her creditor and stated: “All returned checks are subject to a minimum charge of $25.00.” The suit argues that Berks Credit & Collections is, first of all, required to clearly identify the consumer’s creditor, and secondly, not permitted to charge a fee of more than $20 for a returned check. It further alleges that the defendant’s mention of a minimum returned check fee implies to the unsophisticated consumer that the amount of the charge is up to its “unfettered discretion,” when in reality, the additional fee is limited under state law.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.