Consumer Alleges Kay Jewelers Violated CA Privacy Laws by Recording Debt Collection Call
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Chavez v. Signet Group, Inc.
Filed: December 20, 2017 ◆§ 3:17cv2544
Signet Group, which does business as Kay Jewelers, is facing a case that claims it recorded phone calls with customers in California without consent.
A California man alleges in a proposed class action case that defendant Signet Group, Inc., better known as Kay Jewelers, has overstepped the state’s Invasion of Privacy Act by recording phone conversations with consumers without consent to do so. The complaint states the plaintiff received a call from the defendant in August 2017, during which a Kay Jewelers representative spoke with the man for roughly four minutes in an attempt to collect a supposed debt. During the exchange, the defendant never informed the plaintiff that the call was being recorded, the case says.
“[The plaintiff] found [the defendant’s] clandestine recording to be highly offensive due to the delicacy of the topics discussed during said conversations,” the complaint reads. “Had [the plaintiff] received a recording disclosure at the outset of the call, as [the plaintiff] is accustomed to hearing, [the plaintiff] would not have discussed such private information with [the defendant].”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.