Consumer Alleges Fairfax Servicing’s Debt Collection Messages Violate FDCPA
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Yusewitz v. Fairfax Servicing Llc
Filed: March 2, 2018 ◆§ 1:18cv1332
A New York consumer alleges in a proposed class action that defendant Fairfax Servicing LLC left him many answering machine messages in which the company unlawfully failed to identify itself as a debt collector.
A New York consumer alleges in a proposed class action that defendant Fairfax Servicing LLC left him many answering machine messages in which the company unlawfully failed to identify itself as a debt collector attempting to collect a debt, as well as state the company’s legal name. The lawsuit claims such conduct is a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which shields consumers against misleading debt collection communications.
“[Fairfax Servicing’s] communications were designed to cause the debtor to suffer a harmful disadvantage in charting a course of action in response to [the company’s] collection efforts,” the complaint reads.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.