Class Action Takes Issue with PHEAA’s Student Loan Servicing Practices
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Anderson v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
Filed: April 2, 2018 ◆§ 2:18cv1378
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (PHEAA) is facing another proposed class action that claims the student loan servicer attempted to delay debtors' loan forgiveness in order to continue collecting interest and fees.
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (PHEAA) is facing another proposed class action that claims the student loan servicer attempted to delay debtors' loan forgiveness in order to continue collecting interest and fees. The suit notes that the defendant – which does business as FedLoan Servicing and American Education Services – is responsible for collecting payments owed to the Department of Education and earns interest along with “various subsidies and special allowance payments” for each of the loans in its portfolio.
The complaint explains that PHEAA is also responsible for approving consumers’ applications to student loan forgiveness programs such as the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program, the Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education (TEACH) program, and Income Driven Repayment (IDR) plans. Each of these programs, the case continues, provides loan forgiveness after debtors have made a certain number of qualifying payments toward their loans.
“But,” the suit poses, “helping these borrowers get out of debt sooner directly conflicts with PHEAA’s financial interest in collecting interest and servicing fees on active loans.” The lawsuit argues that the defendant has orchestrated a scheme to extend the length of debtors’ loans, and therefore earn more revenue, by improperly delaying or failing to process their applications to forgiveness programs and incorrectly placing their loans into “forbearance” or “deferment” status. The case points out that debtors’ payments don't count toward forgiveness programs before their applications are approved or while their loans are in forbearance or deferment. Therefore, the complaint concludes, debtors are unjustifiably required to pay more than they would have absent the defendant’s conduct.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.