Class Action Says There’s ‘Nothing Texas’ About North Carolina-Made Texas Pete Hot Sauce [DIMISSED]
Last Updated on October 18, 2023
White v. T.W. Garner Food Co.
Filed: September 12, 2022 ◆§ 2:22-cv-06503
The maker of Texas Pete Original Hot Sauce faces a class action that alleges there’s “surprisingly nothing Texas” about the product since it’s made in North Carolina.
California Business and Professions Code California Unfair Competition Law California Consumers Legal Remedies Act
California
October 18, 2023 – Texas Pete Lawsuit Dismissed After T.W. Garner Food Co.’s Alleged “Harassment” of Plaintiff
The proposed class action detailed on this page was dismissed without prejudice on October 4, 2023, with the plaintiff claiming that T.W. Garner Food Co. “successfully intimidated” him into dismissing the case.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The lawsuit was tossed days after the plaintiff filed a two-page motion to voluntarily dismiss the case on September 28. According to a 19-page memorandum submitted that same day, the plaintiff sought dismissal due to what he claimed was T.W. Garner Food Co.’s “persistent and escalating” harassment toward him, an employee at the law firm representing him, and friends and family members who purportedly have no connection to the lawsuit.
Per the document, the defendant’s “abusive behavior” was based on “meritless speculation” that the plaintiff was recruited by his counsel to bring this case against T.W. Garner Food Co. as part of an illegal “capper arrangement.”
According to one law firm, this type of arrangement occurs when attorneys attempt to circumvent rules that prohibit them from directly soliciting potential clients by hiring “cappers” to solicit their legal services to individuals on their behalf.
The memo alleges that the defendant’s accusations—which were publicly lodged in an initial case management statement—are “predicated entirely” on “an unrelated case” the plaintiff filed in a different court against the Kroger Co. in 2021. The document says that Kroger, based on the belief that the plaintiff’s counsel procured him through an unlawful “capper” arrangement, hired private investigators to surveil and serve subpoenas to the man’s friends and family members until he was forced to dismiss the case to stop the harassment.
Although the previous court found no evidence that the plaintiff engaged in an illegal arrangement or wrongdoing of any kind, T.W. Garner Food Co. nevertheless imitated Kroger’s allegedly harassing tactics and regurgitated its “baseless” accusations, the memo claims.
“In the end, Defendant has successfully intimidated Plaintiff into dismissing this action through its deliberate use of subpoenas to harass Plaintiff, his friends, his counsel, and his counsel’s family members, and by leveraging the public nature of legal proceedings to defame him publicly in an initial case management statement with speculative and unfounded charges,” the document contends, claiming the defendant’s actions have left the plaintiff “understandably uncomfortable.”
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The maker of Texas Pete Original Hot Sauce faces a proposed class action that alleges there’s “surprisingly nothing Texas” about the product since, unbeknownst to consumers, it’s made in North Carolina.
The 46-page case says that the label of the Louisiana-style hot sauce misleadingly uses “distinctly Texan imagery,” including the white “lone” star found on the state’s flag and a cowboy wielding a lasso, to deceive buyers as to the geographic origin of the product.
The lawsuit, filed in California on September 12, contends that defendant T.W. Garner Food Co. “concocted this false marketing and labeling scheme” because it knows Texas and its food culture “enjoy[] a certain mysticism and appeal” to consumers.
“By way of its false marketing and labeling, Defendant knowingly and intentionally capitalizes on consumers’ desire to partake in the culture and authentic cuisine of one of the most prideful states in America,” the complaint reads, alleging T.W. Garner Food Co. has “cheated its way” to a leading position in the $1.5 billion U.S. hot sauce industry.
Absent class-wide relief, the complaint argues, the defendant’s “deceptive marketing and labeling scheme” will continue unchecked to the detriment of consumers, who’ve paid money for an “inauthentic” product, and smaller hot sauce companies who “play by the rules.”
“This stifles competition, reduces consumer choice, and leads to consumers paying higher prices at the cash register for inferior goods,” the suit contends.
According to the case, manufacturers and marketers rely on origin claims to distinguish their products from others, and consumers rely on the accuracy of those claims in making buying decisions. Consumers are willing to pay a premium for products that are authentically connected to a particular geographic area, such as authentic Mexican tortillas, Belgian chocolate, and wines from Napa, California, the complaint relays.
A hot sauce is considered “Texan” if it is made in the state using Texas ingredients and flavor profiles, the case says. The flavor profile of “Texas” hot sauces was crafted over several hundred years, the lawsuit stresses, and the state’s hot sauce tradition is one rooted in its dry climate, ideal for pepper production, and the flavors of Tex-Mex cuisine.
In light of the foregoing, the defendant “trades on the reputation and fascination” with Texas-associated flavors by positioning Texas Pete hot sauce as made in the state, even though it’s been produced in Winston-Salem, North Carolina since its inception, the lawsuit alleges.
Further, the case says that T.W. Garner Food Co. “admits” that it’s aware that Texas Pete hot sauce is deceptively labeled on its website, in a section that asks, “[s]o how is it that a tasty red pepper sauce made in North Carolina happens to be named ‘Texas Pete’ anyway?”
“The answer is simple: when trying to think of a name, Defendant’s founders chose Texas because it ‘had a reputation for spicy cuisine.’ In revealing the thought process behind its brand name, Defendant admits that Texas’s reputation was one they were trying to mimic and capitalize on when creating their brand.”
Although the product’s back label states that the hot sauce is made in North Carolina, the filing contends that consumers do not see this prior to purchase.
The lawsuit looks to cover all United States residents who, within the applicable statute of limitations period, bought Texas Pete-brand hot sauce, including the Original, Hotter Hot and Roasted Garlic varieties.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.