Class Action Says Square, Cash App Developer Block Bars Users from Posting Negative Statements
Last Updated on October 2, 2024
Mora et al. v. Block, Inc. et al.
Filed: January 26, 2024 ◆§ 2:24-cv-00739
Block faces a class action over a provision in its terms of service that bars users from publicly making any “objectionable” statements about the company.
Block faces a proposed class action over an apparent provision in the terms of service for its financial platform and mobile apps that bars users from publicly making any “objectionable” or “harmful” statements about the company or its partners or products.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The 11-page lawsuit alleges Block—the parent company of financial services platform Square and mobile payment service Cash App—has “clearly” violated California law by subjecting users to terms of service that “stifle” their right to free speech.
According to the suit, state law prohibits any contract or proposed contract from including a provision that waives a consumer’s right to “make any statement regarding the seller or lessor or its employees or agents, or concerning the goods or services.”
Contrary to state regulations, Block has attempted to limit negative publicity by imposing on users terms that forbid them from making public statements that “contain anything that [Block] think[s] is objectionable” or harmful to the company, the case contends.
This “chilling” conduct aims to “silence” users—who purportedly agree to the terms simply by accessing Block’s services—and prevent any negative statements from tarnishing the public image of the company and its affiliates, the complaint claims.
The filing charges, however, that Block’s “strong-arm tactics” and “self-promoting” business practices, which are designed to maintain and grow its consumer base and “prop up [its] stock price,” are plainly prohibited by California law.
The freedom of consumers to “voice their opinions” is “important to keep the public informed and keep large corporations honest about the quality of the goods or services they offer to consumers,” the case stresses.
The lawsuit looks to represent any California residents who, during the statute of limitations period, visited or completed a transaction using Block’s financial platform, mobile apps, websites, software or other services.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.