Class Action Says Rhino Relocation Ignored National Do-Not-Call List
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Clayton v. Rhino Relocation
Filed: March 6, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-00324-DAD-SAB
A proposed class action citing alleged Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violations claims defendant Rhino Relocation used a prohibited automatic telephone dialer.
A proposed class action citing alleged Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violations claims defendant Rhino Relocation used a prohibited automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers. The plaintiff, a California woman, claims she began receiving robocalls from the defendant around May 2016 without ever having provided consent to be contacted. Worse, the plaintiff claims in the suit that her phone number has been in the National Do-Not-Call Registry since as far back as 2011.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.