Class Action Says Calling International Delight a Coffee Creamer Is Inaccurate
Last Updated on December 22, 2022
Jasper v. Danone North America Public Benefit Corporation
Filed: December 19, 2022 ◆§ 1:22-cv-07122
A class action contends that International Delight is not technically a coffee “creamer” since it lacks cream or dairy ingredients beyond a minimal amount of sodium caseinate.
Illinois
A proposed class action contends that International Delight is not technically a coffee “creamer” since it lacks cream or dairy ingredients beyond a minimal amount of sodium caseinate.
The 12-page suit says that coffee cream is a specialized dairy product that “contains not less than 18 percent but less than 30 percent milkfat,” with added sweeteners and/or flavorings. Although “coffee creamer” appears on the front label of the International Delight products at issue, the items use water and palm oil in place of cream, purportedly for cost-cutting purposes, the case claims.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Overall, the International Delight products, made by defendant Danone North America Public Benefit Corporation, are not labeled in a way that distinguishes them from coffee creamers that include real cream, the complaint reads.
A product’s statement of identity must be a name required by law or regulation, a common or usual name, or an appropriately descriptive term, the lawsuit states. “Coffee creamer” is not the International Delight products’ common or usual name since it is not uniform among “all identical or similar products” and is “confusingly similar” to items called “coffee creamer” that actually contain dairy ingredients such as cream, the complaint says.
“The name of ‘coffee creamer’ applied to products without cream has not been established by common usage,” the case argues.
The suit analogously shares that the FDA, for instance, warned a company who called its product “Just Mayo” that consumers may be misled since the item did not contain eggs. The “mayo,” like the “coffee creamer” in question, the case says, contained ingredients not permitted by the standards for mayonnaise “in contrast to decades of consumer familiarity with ingredients for standardized foods.”
Lastly, the filing says that consumers value real cream over non-dairy coffee whiteners for its nutritional benefits and taste.
The lawsuit looks to cover consumers in Illinois, Arkansas, South Dakota, Wyoming, North Carolina, Utah, Montana, Idaho, Mississippi, Virginia and Oklahoma who’ve bought International Delight coffee “creamer” within the applicable statute of limitations period.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.