Class Action Lawsuit Challenges Controversial Mask Ban in Nassau County, New York [DISMISSED]
Last Updated on October 15, 2024
G.B. et al. v. Nassau County et al.
Filed: August 22, 2024 ◆§ 2:24-cv-05884
A class action lawsuit alleges Nassau County's Mask Transparency Act is unconstitutional and discriminatory toward people with disabilities.
Americans With Disabilities Act Constitution of the United States of America Rehabilitation Act of 1973
New York
Civil Rights Medical/Health Government Discrimination COVID-19
October 15, 2024 – Judge Dismisses Class Action Over Mask Ban in New York’s Nassau County
The proposed class action lawsuit detailed on this page was dismissed without prejudice by a federal judge on September 25, 2024.
Get the latest open class action lawsuits sent to your inbox. Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter.
In a 15-page memo and order issued that day, United States District Judge Joan M. Azrack tossed the class action suit on the grounds that the plaintiffs lacked sufficient standing to assert their claims before the court.
Judge Azrack wrote that the plaintiffs did not adequately demonstrate that they suffered or will suffer concrete injury as a result of Nassau County’s Mask Transparency Act (MTA). The judge noted that the law criminalizes masks worn with the “intent to conceal the identity of the wearer” and expressly excludes those worn to “protect the health or safety of the wearer.”
Per the order, the plaintiffs, who wear masks to guard against illness, therefore “lack standing to challenge the [MTA] because, simply put, it does not apply to them.”
In addition, the plaintiffs argued they could face prosecution for violating the MTA because law enforcement may misapply the law. However, Judge Azrack pointed out that, legally, the consumers “cannot rely on an argument that the statute might be misconstrued by law enforcement.”
Finally, although the plaintiffs alleged they had standing due to anticipated harassment from other citizens hostile to mask-wearers, the judge found the claim to be insufficient. In the order, Judge Azrack asserted that the consumers did not adequately show they will suffer the “hypothetical harassment,” nor would such an incident be reasonably traceable to the county’s adoption of the MTA.
The court officially closed the case on September 26, 2024, and the plaintiffs were denied any opportunity to amend their complaint.
Check out ClassAction.org’s lawsuit list for the latest open class action lawsuits and investigations.
A proposed class action lawsuit alleges Nassau County, New York’s Mask Transparency Act, which bans wearing a face mask in public in certain contexts, is unconstitutional and discriminatory toward people with disabilities.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The 20-page lawsuit against Nassau County and county executive Bruce Blakeman was filed after Disability Rights New York (DRNY) sent a letter on August 14 detailing its concerns about the impact of the mask ban on those with disabilities. Though DRNY requested a stay in enforcement of the mask ban, which was signed into law on August 14, 2024, and a meeting to discuss the resolution of its concerns, the organization received no response, the complaint says.
According to the lawsuit, Nassau County has a mandatory obligation to refrain from passing local laws inconsistent with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other federal or state statutes.
“Local laws that abrogate or curtail rights conferred by federal law are inconsistent with federal law, conflict preempted, and rendered invalid by operation of law,” the lawsuit states.
The mask ban was enacted in the wake of a series of events involving individuals wearing masks in public, and despite concerns that the bill, which supporters say could be a crime deterrent, could lead to increased racial profiling and discrimination. Power to enforce the mask ban, namely deciding the rationale of why a person is wearing a mask, rests with Nassau County police officers, who the lawsuit says have “no standard” to determine whether a masked person meets the law’s exception for masks worn for health reasons.
One of the pseudonymous plaintiffs, a longtime Nassau County resident and disability rights advocate, has been diagnosed with cerebral palsy and asthma and faces a higher risk of contracting airborne illnesses, from which it takes them longer to recover, the case states. The plaintiff wears a mask to protect themselves from illness wherever they go in public, and says in the suit that they are “fearful of police interaction, arrest, and detainment because they wear a facemask in Nassau County.”
“While in public and private places, strangers have come up to G.B. since August 5, 2024, to ask them if they are sick, if they are healthy or not, and to ask why they are wearing a facemask,” the complaint says, stressing that the plaintiff fears being arrested “just for wearing a facemask for their health.”
The second plaintiff has been diagnosed with variable immunodeficiency, kidney disease, post-viral syndrome and a respiratory condition and, like the first plaintiff, faces a higher risk of contracting an airborne illness and facing medical complications or a longer recovery time should they get sick, the suit continues. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the plaintiff continues to wear a face mask in public, and in recent weeks has “received sneering looks from other members of the public when they are wearing a mask,” the lawsuit says.
“S.S. fears harassment and assault from anti-mask people in Nassau County,” the suit reads. “S.S. fears being stopped and questioned by police.”
At an hours-long public meeting on August 5, the Nassau County Legislature allowed each attendee three minutes to speak about the proposed mask ban, the filing shares. Supporters of the ban, who were allowed to speak first, “spoke of hate speech, genocide, the Holocaust, criminal thugs, and terrorism,” and were allowed to exceed their allotted three minutes, the case says.
According to the complaint, those who spoke against the mask ban were threatened with removal from the meeting if they spoke beyond three minutes. Nassau County police reportedly arrested an individual with a disability who was wearing a mask at the meeting.
“People wearing masks were harassed by members of the public sitting in the gallery,” the filing says. “Non-masked people coughed on, yelled at, and threatened people wearing masks.”
The lawsuit relays that the mask ban prohibits the wearing of any mask or facial covering whereby the face or voice is disguised “with the intent to conceal the identity of the wearer.” The mask ban does not apply to facial coverings worn to protect the health and safety of the wearer, for religious or cultural purposes, or for the peaceful celebration of a holiday or similar religious or cultural event, the filing states.
The law stipulates that a law enforcement officer may require someone wearing a mask to remove it during traffic stops or in the event the officer has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, the suit adds. Per the case, violations of the mask ban are a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and up to a year of imprisonment.
The mask ban lawsuit looks to cover all individuals who wear masks while in Nassau County, New York, because of their disability or to accommodate others with disabilities.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.