Class Action: GM Financial, Experian Failed to Remove Duplicate Items from Credit Reports
Last Updated on October 1, 2024
Ravitz v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al.
Filed: November 25, 2019 ◆§ 7:19-cv-10908
A class action claims Experian and GM Financial failed to investigate and correct inaccurate information contained in consumer credit reports.
New York
A proposed class action lawsuit claims Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., which does business as GM Financial, included duplicate debts in New York consumers’ credit reports and failed to properly investigate when consumers disputed the information.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
With regard to the lead plaintiff, the woman claims Experian erroneously listed a purported GM Financial debt twice in one 2019 credit report. The plaintiff states she wrote a letter to Experian in April of the same year in which she disputed the inclusion of the duplicate account. Despite being notified of the plaintiff’s dispute, GM, the case claims, failed to conduct a reasonable investigation into the information in question and continued reporting the duplicate item on her credit report. Experian similarly failed to properly investigate the plaintiff’s claims, according to the suit. From the complaint:
“Despite the dispute by the Plaintiff that the information on her consumer report was inaccurate with respect to the dispute [sic] account, Experian did not evaluate or consider any of the information, claims, or evidence of the Plaintiff and did not make an attempt to substantially reasonably verify that the derogatory information concerning the disputed account was inaccurate.”
Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), credit reporting agencies (CRAs) like Experian are required to conduct reasonable investigations into information disputed by consumers, correct any erroneous items and note in future credit reports that the accounts are contested, the case explains. According to the suit, the FCRA also requires furnishers such as GM to conduct timely investigations into disputed information and to notify CRAs of the investigation’s results. The case contends the defendants failed to execute these duties, causing the plaintiff to suffer a decrease in her credit score as a result.
The lawsuit seeks to represent a class comprising all New York residents for whom GM continued to report a duplicate debt to credit bureaus after being notified the item was reported twice on the same credit report within the five years prior to the complaint’s filing.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.