Class Action: Gillette, Venus, Braun, Oral-B Warranties Contain Illegal ‘Tying Arrangements’ that Prohibit Certain Repairs
Watson v. The Procter & Gamble Company et al.
Filed: January 21, 2022 ◆§ 4:22-cv-40010
Procter & Gamble and Gillette face a class action that alleges the companies have unlawfully tied the validity of their product warranties to the use of only authorized repair services or replacement parts.
Massachusetts
Procter & Gamble and subsidiary Gillette face a proposed class action that alleges the companies have unlawfully tied the validity of their consumer product warranties to the use of only authorized repair services or replacement parts.
The 17-page lawsuit says the so-called “tying arrangements” wielded by the companies, who make and sell products under the Gillette, Venus, Braun and Oral-B brands, violate state and federal law and are not immediately apparent to buyers at the point of sale.
The plaintiff, a Shirley, Massachusetts resident, claims to have bought a Braun electric shaver in June 2019 under the belief that he would be able to repair the product himself if it malfunctioned. The consumer was unaware, the suit says, that any self-repair to the shaver was prohibited under the terms of the product’s warranty.
“Defendants disclosed on the packaging that the Product included a one-year limited warranty but did not disclose that the warranty included an unlawful repair restriction,” the complaint says, claiming the plaintiff would not have purchased the shaver, or would have paid substantially less for it, had he known the full nature of the defendants’ warranty.
According to the lawsuit, the defendants condition warranty coverage on the usage of their own repair services. The companies’ warranties include specific language that states that a warranty “becomes void if repairs are undertaken by unauthorized persons and if [brand] parts are not used,” the suit states.
According to the case, Procter & Gamble and Gillette, by conditioning their warranties in this manner, have violated the tying ban in the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, which prohibits a company from conditioning its warranty on a consumer’s use of any article or service, other than one provided free of charge under the warranty, identified by brand, trade or corporation name.
The lawsuit looks to cover all U.S. buyers of Gillette, Venus, Braun and Oral-B products that came with a warranty provision prohibiting self-repair and/or the use of unauthorized parts.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.