Class Action Claims Carter’s Obtained Job Applicant Background Reports Without Authorization
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on November 15, 2024
Mayorga v. Carter’s Inc. et al.
Filed: March 3, 2022 ◆§ 2:22-cv-01467
A class action claims Carter’s and its subsidiaries failed to provide certain statutory disclosures before performing background checks on prospective employees.
California
A proposed class action claims children’s clothing retailer Carter’s and several subsidiaries have failed to provide certain statutory disclosures before performing background checks on prospective employees.
Don’t miss the next class action settlement deadline. Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter.
The nine-page complaint alleges Carter’s; Carter’s Retail, Inc.; the William Carter Company; and Oshkosh B’Gosh, Inc. have unlawfully used consumer reports for employment purposes without first disclosing to job applicants that a background check would be performed and informing them of their right to request a summary of their rights under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
The lawsuit contends Carter’s has violated prospective employees’ privacy rights by procuring their consumer reports by way of “inadequate disclosures.”
The plaintiff claims to have been employed with the defendants between August and November 2021. According to the suit, Carter’s performed a background investigation on the plaintiff when she applied for employment but failed to provide mandatory disclosures in connection with the background check.
The lawsuit alleges the defendants’ background check disclosures violate the FCRA in that they are not provided in a “clear and conspicuous” standalone document that consists only of the disclosure that a consumer report may be obtained for employment purposes. According to the case, the disclosure provided by the retailers is “embedded with extraneous information,” including “misleading” information concerning an applicant’s FCRA rights and requests for “extensive background information,” along with a disclaimer regarding the use of the requested information.
“Under the FCRA, it is unlawful to procure or cause to be procured, a consumer report or investigative consumer report for employment purposes unless the disclosure is made in a document that consists solely of the disclosure and the consumer has authorized, in writing, the procurement of the report,” the complaint reads.
The lawsuit further alleges that the defendants have failed to provide prospective employees with notice of their right to request a summary of their FCRA rights at the time they are provided with the background check disclosure as required by law.
The case, which was initially filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court on January 20, 2022 before being removed to California’s Central District Court on March 3, looks to represent all current, former and prospective Carter’s applicants for employment in the U.S. for whom a background check was performed in connection with their job application within the past five years and until the date final judgment is entered in the lawsuit.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.