Class Action Alleges Twitter ‘Fraudulently’ Acquired Washington Users’ Phone Numbers
Gray v. Twitter, Inc.
Filed: September 21, 2020 ◆§ 2:20-cv-01389
A Washington resident claims Twitter has used "fraudulent, deceptive, or false means" to obtain users' telephone numbers in order to share such with advertisers.
A Washington resident alleges in a proposed class action that Twitter has resorted to “fraudulent, deceptive, or false means” to acquire users’ telephone numbers, arguing the social media platform meets the definition of a telecommunications company under state law and is therefore bound by the according privacy regulations.
The plaintiff claims in the 11-page complaint that she and other Washington residents provided their phone numbers to Twitter with the belief that they would be able to maintain control over the company’s use of their numbers via functions made available on Twitter’s user-facing systems.
Notwithstanding Twitter’s privacy assurances, the company “did not create, implement or execute systems that honored users’ designations as to use of those numbers,” the lawsuit alleges, claiming the defendant disclosed users’ phone numbers to advertisers despite promising otherwise.
According to the case, Twitter, in obtaining phone numbers, “falsely assured Washington users that it would honor the privacy choices exercised by users.” The suit says Twitter owes a penalty of $5,000 for each instance in which it unlawfully obtained a Washington user’s phone number.
“Behemoth providers of ubiquitous digital platforms make promises of privacy when they solicit users,” the complaint reads. “Too often, those promises are not kept.”
Under Washington law, a telecommunications company is defined as “every corporation, company, association, joint stock association, partnership and person, their lessees … and every city and town owning, operating or managing” facilities used to provide telecommunications for hire, sale or resale to the general public within the state, the suit says. Per the case, Twitter fits this definition given it provides telecommunications for hire, sale or resale to the general public, “at least by virtue of its provision, for money, of advertising to Twitter users.”
The lawsuit says Twitter “concealed its wrongdoing” until October 8, 2019, when it publicly acknowledged that after users provided the company with their email addresses or phone numbers for safety or security purposes, this data “may have inadvertently been used for advertising purposes.” The plaintiff argues that no matter Twitter’s definition of the word “inadvertently,” the company used “fraudulent, deceptive, or false means” to obtain users’ phone numbers for the sake of boosting ad revenue.
“Twitter committed its acts of fraudulent, deceptive, or false means of obtaining telephone records for financial gain,” the complaint reiterates.
The Washington law at the center of the case—RCW 9.26A.140—dictates that it’s illegal to intentionally sell a resident’s telephone record “without the authorization of the customer to whom the record pertains.”
The case looks to represent anyone in Washington state who provided a telephone number to Twitter prior to October 8, 2019.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.