Class Action Alleges Gannett Illegally Discloses Subscriber Data to Facebook [DISMISSED]
Last Updated on October 5, 2023
Buechler et al. v. Gannett Company, Inc.
Filed: November 7, 2022 ◆§ 1:22-cv-01464-UNA
A class action alleges Gannett has unlawfully disclosed certain personal information about its subscribers to Facebook without consent or adequate disclosure.
October 5, 2023 – Gannett Video Privacy Lawsuit Dismissed; Plaintiffs Can Try Again
The proposed class action detailed on this page was dismissed without prejudice on October 2, 2023 after a federal judge found that the plaintiffs failed to present their allegations with “sufficient clarity.”
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
In a 14-page memo, U.S. District Judge Colm F. Connolly stated that the plaintiffs’ “confusing” and “ambiguous” lawsuit does not clearly allege what personal information was disclosed from Gannett’s websites, how it was shared with Facebook or who caused the disclosures.
“The bottom line is that the Complaint is too poorly drafted for me to evaluate the competing arguments of the parties on this issue,” the judge wrote. “The sloppiness of the Complaint is apparent on its face, and there is good reason to believe that the Complaint is a copy-and-paste job.”
Judge Connolly gave the plaintiffs until November 17, 2023 to file an amended complaint.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
A proposed class action alleges print and online media publisher Gannett has unlawfully disclosed certain personal information about its subscribers to Facebook without consent or adequate disclosure.
The 34-page case claims that when individuals watch video content offered on Gannett-owned websites, their personal information and viewing activity are secretly captured and sent to Facebook. The suit contends that Gannett, the largest newspaper publisher in the United States, has violated the federal Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) by failing to obtain consumers’ express written consent before disseminating their personally identifiable information to a third party.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
To transmit information to Facebook, Gannett has embedded onto its webpages a piece of code known as the “Facebook tracking pixel,” which uses cookies to automatically forward data to the social media giant, including the titles and URLs of videos watched and consumers’ Facebook User ID numbers (UID).
“A Facebook UID can be used, by anyone, to easily identify a Facebook user,” the case states. “Once the Tracking Methods’ routine exchange of information is complete, the UID that becomes available can be used by any individual to easily identify a Facebook user, by simply appending the Facebook UID to www.facebook.com.”
According to the suit, Facebook provides Gannett web developers with event monitoring tools because access to more data helps improve its targeted advertising abilities.
Although the company owns more than 260 daily publications whose associated news sites appear to be “completely separate” from one another, each site uses media supplied and hosted by Gannett, as well as the publisher’s tracking methods, the case contends.
The two plaintiffs claim that they have subscribed to the Gannett-owned news site The Tennessean within the past year and watched video content using devices signed into Facebook. Since the publication’s video content is streamed and hosted by Gannett, the consumers’ data, unbeknownst to them, was sent to Facebook, the complaint alleges.
“The sign-up process associated with the Gannett Sites does not include a process for seeking or obtaining informed, written consent,” the filing states. “To the extent information about any of the Gannett Sites’ data sharing can be located, the language is not presented to subscribers or users along with a checkbox, e-signature field, or any form of affirmative consent.”
The lawsuit looks to cover anyone in the United States with a subscription to a Gannett Site and who had their personal information improperly disclosed to Facebook through the use of the tracking methods outlined in the complaint.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.