Citing Lack of Closed Captioning, Lawsuit Claims AOL.com Discriminates Against Deaf Users
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Dejesus v. Oath, Inc.
Filed: September 29, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-07458
AOL.com is the subject of litigation alleging the videos on the heavily trafficked website are discriminatory due to their lack of closed captioning.
Oath, Inc., AOL.com’s parent company, is the defendant in a proposed class action that alleges a lack of closed captioning for videos is discriminatory toward deaf and hard-of-hearing internet users. Filed in New York, the 23-page complaint claims Aol.com, despite the availability of assistive accessibility technology, has instead chosen to post videos without closed captioning and thereby denies proposed class members full and independent access to the site’s video content.
“The failure of [Oath] to provide equal access to millions of deaf and hard of hearing individuals violates the mandate of the [Americans with Disabilities Act] to provide ‘full and equal enjoyment’ of a public accommodation’s goods, services, facilities, and privileges,” the case argues.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.