C & F Finance Company Facing Lawsuit Over Alleged Collection of Convenience Fees
Last Updated on June 14, 2018
Miller v. C & F Finance Company
Filed: June 1, 2018 ◆§ 8:18-cv-01594-CCB
A proposed class action recently removed to Maryland federal court details two plaintiffs’ allegations concerning defendant C & F Finance Company’s alleged violations of Maryland’s Credit Grantor Closed End Credit Provisions.
A proposed class action recently removed to Maryland federal court details two plaintiffs’ allegations concerning defendant C & F Finance Company’s alleged violations of Maryland’s Credit Grantor Closed End Credit Provisions (CLEC).
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, claim the Retail Installment Sale Contract (RISC) of $22,940.88 for their purchase of a 2008 Ford Edge was assigned to C & F Finance, with finance charges over the lifetime of the RISC pegged at $12,281.37. According to the plaintiffs, C & F Finance received payments on their account “totaling less than the amount financed,” indicating that the defendant charged one or more convenience fees.
According to the lawsuit, CLEC restricts grantors such as the defendant from charging or collecting any fees or interest not specifically defined in a credit contract.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.