Certain Aroeve Air Purifiers Not as Efficient as Advertised, Class Action Lawsuit Claims
Schwartz v. Antadi LLC
Filed: December 23, 2024 ◆§ 1:24-cv-09898
A proposed class action lawsuit alleges certain Aroeve air purifiers were falsely advertised as equipped with HEPA filters.
A proposed class action lawsuit alleges certain Aroeve air purifiers were falsely advertised as equipped with HEPA filters.
Get the latest open class action lawsuits sent to your inbox. Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter.
According to the 27-page lawsuit, high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters are strictly designed to meet specific standards for capturing small, airborne pathogens. The U.S. Department of Energy states that a filtration system must trap at least 99.97 percent of dust, pollen, mold, bacteria or other particles as small as 0.3 microns in order to qualify as HEPA, the filing relays.
Although Aroeve represented its air purifiers—specifically, models MK01, MK04 and MK06—as having HEPA-grade filters, independent laboratory testing showed that the products were “not even remotely close” to meeting the required standards, the complaint claims.
Per the case, testing also revealed that the air purifiers did not meet their claims of using H13 HEPA filters, which capture at least 99.95 percent of particles and are considered medical grade.
In 2024, a competing company challenged Aroeve’s allegedly misleading HEPA and H13 representations in a dispute brought before the National Advertising Division of the Better Business Bureau, the case says. The defendant has since agreed to remove such claims from its product pages and packaging, but the suit argues that the effort is “a day late and a dollar short.”
“[Aroeve] has profited greatly from the explosion in the air-purifier market brought about by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and yearly ‘once-in-a-lifetime’ wildfires that have ravaged the United States. Consumers are rightfully concerned about maintaining indoor spaces that are free of harmful pathogens and contaminants. As a result, a large portion of [the defendant’s] enormous profits are attributable to the HEPA filtration claims that it falsely made about its Products.”
The plaintiff, a New York City resident who suffers from asthma and allergies, says he bought an Aroeve air purifier after smoke from Canadian wildfires drifted into the Big Apple in June 2023. As the case tells it, the plaintiff was willing to pay a premium price for the product due to its HEPA label and promises of high-quality filtration. The man asserts that he would not have bought the air purifier, or paid significantly less for the product, had he known its filter did not meet HEPA standards.
The lawsuit looks to represent anyone in the United States who purchased an Aroeve MK01, MK04 or MK06 air purifier or replacement filter during the applicable statute of limitations period.
Did you know that some class action settlements require no proof to submit a claim? Check out the latest open class action settlements.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.