CA Avocado Grower’s Lawsuit Takes Issue with Xerox’s Allegedly Unconscionable Business Tactics [UPDATE]
Last Updated on August 18, 2021
Eco Farms Sales, Inc. v. Xerox Corporation
Filed: September 12, 2017 ◆§ 6:17-cv-06637
According to a new class action, Xerox milks additional money out of customers through questionable contract language and other allegedly below-bar business methods.
Case Updates
August 18, 2021 – Case Dismissed
The proposed class action lawsuit detailed on this page was dismissed with prejudice on January 19, 2018, meaning it cannot be refiled.
No details about the dismissal have been made available. The one-page dismissal order, found here, states that the dismissal is “on the merits and with prejudice and without costs or fees to any party.”
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Temecula, California’s Eco Farms Sales, Inc. has filed a proposed class action against Xerox Corporation that claims the company charges excessive, unwarranted fees for customers looking to end lease agreements, among other supposedly unacceptable business tactics. The plaintiff, a company that grows, packs and markets avocados, claims in its 22-page complaint that Xerox unlawfully induces individual and business customers into contracts for printing and copying equipment without disclosing the true cost of such services. Moreover, the case alleges Xerox “buries unconscionable and self-serving provisions” into the contracts’ fine print, which can lead to substantial penalties should the customer terminate the agreement before its natural end.
Once an individual or business enters into a contract with Xerox, the company then allegedly levies enormous fee increases, which the lawsuit says effectively handcuff customers to one of two possibly costly decisions.
“Xerox engages in such tactics because, once the customer signs the contract, they are put to a Hobson’s choice: (a) pay the increased fees or (b) terminate the contract and pay enormous early termination fees,” the complaint says.
Further still, the lawsuit takes issue with the terms and conditions allegedly contained within Xerox’s customer contracts, through which the plaintiff claims the company tries to “back-track” from agreed upon rates while it “asserts authority to increase the customer’s fees whenever and to whatever amount it desires.”
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.