Biehl & Biehl Accused of Misrepresenting Woman’s Debt as Time-Barred
by Nadia Abbas
Last Updated on September 18, 2018
Giannetti v. Biehl & Biehl, Inc.
Filed: September 13, 2018 ◆§ 2:18cv5174
Biehl & Biehl, Inc. allegedly sent a letter to a New York consumer that falsely suggested the woman’s debt was time-barred.
A proposed class action against Biehl & Biehl, Inc. claims the collection agency sent a letter to a New York consumer that falsely suggested the woman’s debt was time-barred.
According to the suit, the September 2017 letter stated, in part:
“Your creditor or debt collector believes the legal time limit (statute of limitations) for suing you to collect this debt may have expired.”
The complaint alleges the debt was not, in fact, time-barred at the time of the letter. This misinformation, the case argues, would affect how a consumer responds to the notice and could result in the recipient being “strongly disinclined from taking any action whatsoever” to resolve the debt. From the complaint:
“The least sophisticated consumer would likely believe that such inaction is in her best interest when, in fact, such inaction would only increase her risk of being sued in connection with collection of the subject Debt.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.