Best Buy Fails to Display Product Warranty Terms at Point of Sale, Class Action Claims
by Erin Shaak
Keiser v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.
Filed: September 6, 2022 ◆§ 1:22-cv-04771
A class action claims Best Buy has violated a federal law by failing to provide certain warranty information about its products prior to the point of sale.
A proposed class action claims Best Buy has violated a federal law by failing to provide certain warranty information about its products prior to the point of sale.
The 15-page lawsuit relays that the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act requires retailers to make the written warranty terms for any product costing more than $15 “readily available for examination” prior to the point of sale, either by displaying the warranty “in close proximity” to the product or placing signs “in prominent locations” throughout the store to inform customers that they may inspect a written warranty on request.
The lawsuit alleges, however, that Best Buy has failed to do so for its products. Instead, the case says, the retailer advertises its own “protection plans” or extended warranties to consumers at the point of sale, with the aim of getting them to buy coverage that may be duplicative of what’s provided through a manufacturer’s warranty.
“If the consumer is not made aware of this warranty, or is prohibited from learning of the warranty’s specific terms until after the point of sale, then he or she is more likely to buy Defendant’s duplicative ‘protection plan,’” the complaint contends.
Although the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act allows a retailer to display or provide the text of a product warranty via electronic means, “it is not enough” for the seller to simply refer a shopper to the product manufacturer’s website, the complaint contends.
Per the suit, the terms of the warranties for “virtually all” products sold in Best Buy’s retail stores are not available in full to consumers prior to the point of sale, even through electronic means.
“Defendant does not display product warranties in close proximity to the relevant product; nor does Defendant place signs reasonably calculated to elicit the prospective buyer’s attention, in prominent locations in the store or department, conspicuously advising consumers of the availability of warranties upon request. Indeed, Defendant is unable to provide consumers with copies of warranties upon request, as it does not have said warranties.”
The case claims Best Buy has a “self-serving motive” to not comply with the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act in that the retailer offers its own “Geek Squad” protection plans, which, unbeknownst to buyers, are “largely unnecessary” given they often provide the same or similar coverage as the plans that already come with the product.
The lawsuit looks to represent Illinois residents who purchased one or more products from Best Buy that cost more than $15 and were subject to a written warranty.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s newsletter here.
Video Game Addiction Lawsuits
If your child suffers from video game addiction — including Fortnite addiction or Roblox addiction — you may be able to take legal action. Gamers 18 to 22 may also qualify.
Learn more:Video Game Addiction Lawsuit
Depo-Provera Lawsuits
Anyone who received Depo-Provera or Depo-Provera SubQ injections and has been diagnosed with meningioma, a type of brain tumor, may be able to take legal action.
Read more: Depo-Provera Lawsuit
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.