Barada Associates Included Outdated Information in Background Report, Job Applicant Claims
by Nadia Abbas
Last Updated on January 17, 2019
Clegg v. Barada Associates Inc.
Filed: January 8, 2019 ◆§ 1:19cv138
A Georgia man claims in a proposed class action that an illegal background report furnished by Barada Associates Inc. with outdated and inaccurate information cost him a job opportunity.
A Georgia man claims in a proposed class action that an illegal background report furnished by Barada Associates Inc. with outdated and inaccurate information cost him a job opportunity.
According to the suit, the plaintiff applied for a job with non-party Leidos Health, who contracted Barada Associates Inc. to perform a background check on the man in November 2018. The report allegedly indicated that the plaintiff received five years of probation in 2009 following a first-time theft felony. Pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the case argues this information should not have appeared on the plaintiff’s report as the record was more than seven years old. The suit claims the man was ultimately denied employment due to the defendant’s “defamatory reporting.”
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.