Arvest Faces Class Action Over ‘Pay-to-Pay’ Fees for Online, By-Phone Mortgage Payments
by Erin Shaak
Lange v. Arvest Central Mortgage Co.
Filed: March 19, 2020 ◆§ 4:20-cv-00293
A class action claims mortgage servicer Arvest Central Mortgage Co. charged unlawful “pay-to-pay” fees for online and over-the-phone mortgage payments.
Out of Arkansas federal court comes a proposed class action filed by a consumer who claims mortgage servicer Arvest Central Mortgage Co. charged unlawful “pay-to-pay” fees for online and over-the-phone mortgage payments.
According to the lawsuit, Arvest charges $10 for payments made by phone with a customer service representative and $5 for both online payments and over-the-phone Interactive Voice Response (IVR) payments. These costs, the case alleges, “far exceeded” the cost to Arvest of providing such services, which the suit claims is closer to $0.50. Under Texas law, the mortgage servicer is not permitted to mark up the amount it pays to third parties to provide services to borrowers and thereby “create a profit center for itself,” the lawsuit says.
“Arvest services mortgages throughout the United States and is supposed to be compensated out of the interest paid on each borrower’s monthly payment—not via additional ‘service’ fees that do not reflect the cost to Arvest of providing such services,” the complaint reads.
The case further alleges that Arvest’s “pay-to-pay” fees are not expressly authorized by borrowers’ deeds of trust and are therefore prohibited under Texas debt collection law, which states that debt collectors are not permitted to charge fees that are not expressly authorized by the agreement creating the debt.
The plaintiff seeks to represent “thousands” of similarly situated individuals who paid a fee to Arvest for a mortgage payment made by phone, IVR, or the internet in connection with a residential mortgage loan securing a property in Texas.
Video Game Addiction Lawsuits
If your child suffers from video game addiction — including Fortnite addiction or Roblox addiction — you may be able to take legal action. Gamers 18 to 22 may also qualify.
Learn more:Video Game Addiction Lawsuit
Depo-Provera Lawsuits
Anyone who received Depo-Provera or Depo-Provera SubQ injections and has been diagnosed with meningioma, a type of brain tumor, may be able to take legal action.
Read more: Depo-Provera Lawsuit
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.