ARStrat Hit with Lawsuit Over ‘Unclear’ Collection Letter
by Nadia Abbas
Last Updated on November 14, 2018
Jeger, Individually And on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Arstrat, Llc et al
Filed: November 5, 2018 ◆§ 2:18cv6284
A New York consumer claims that ARStrat sent her two letters that confused her as to the expiration date of her 30-day validation period.
ARStrat, LLC is on the receiving end of a New York woman’s proposed class action in which she alleges the debt collector sent her two letters that confused her as to the expiration date of her 30-day validation period.
According to the case, the defendant sent a letter to the plaintiff in September 2018 that stated:
“We sent you a first notice which included your rights under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. You still have time to exercise your rights.”
The case says the notice then included a disclosure stating the woman’s FDCPA rights—namely, that she had 30 days to dispute the debt before the debt collector would assume its validity. The suit argues that it was “unclear” whether a new validation period commenced from the date of the second letter or if the original deadline was to be followed.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.