Apple Hit with Stock-Drop Class Action Over Allegedly Misleading Statements Concerning iPhone Demand, China Pricing [UPDATE]
Last Updated on September 24, 2024
City of Roseville Employees’ Retirement System v. Apple Inc. et al.
Filed: April 16, 2019 ◆§ 3:19-cv-02033
A stock-drop class action lawsuit claims Apple issued materially misleading statements in Nov. 2018 with regard to iPhone demand and its pricing power in China.
September 24, 2024 – Court Grants Final Approval to $450 Million Apple Securities Fraud Settlement
The $450 million Apple settlement detailed in the update below received final approval from the court on September 18, 2024.
Class members have until October 4, 2024 to file a claim form, which they can submit online through the official settlement website, 2019AppleSecuritiesSettlement.com.
Check out the update below to see who’s eligible for a piece of the class action settlement, how to file a claim, what you can get from the deal and more.
Don’t miss out on settlement news like this. Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
July 11, 2024 – Apple Agrees to Settle iPhone Securities Litigation for $490M
The proposed class action lawsuit detailed on this page has been settled for $490 million, and the time has come for eligible investors to file claims for compensation.
Don’t miss out on settlement news like this. Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The official settlement website can be found at 2019AppleSecuritiesSettlement.com.
The deal, which received preliminary approval from the court on June 3, 2024, covers anyone who purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded securities of Apple Inc., including purchasers of Apple call options and sellers of Apple put options, from November 2, 2018, to January 2, 2019 and suffered damages due to the defendants’ alleged violations the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
To submit a claim online, head to this page.
Class members have until October 4, 2024 to file a claim online or by mail.
Those who submit a timely, valid claim will receive a pro-rated cash payment. Payment amounts will be calculated based on the type of stock the claimant transacted and the relative size of their claim.
Money will begin to be distributed from the securities settlement if and when the deal receives final approval from the court and any appeals are resolved. A final approval hearing is scheduled for September 17, 2024.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
Apple finds itself on the receiving end of a proposed class action lawsuit that looks to represent those who bought common stock in the company between November 2, 2018, and January 2, 2019. The 23-page case out of California alleges Apple, CEO Tim Cook, and Senior Vice President and CFO Luca Maestri issued a series of materially false and misleading statements in November 2018 with regard to apparent demand for iPhones and the company’s pricing muscle in China for its new line of hardware, all of which dented the tech giant’s stock prices.
The run-up to Apple’s allegedly false statements roots back to December 2017, when the company fessed up to “throttling” the performance of the batteries in older iPhones by way of software updates. The effect of this, the case attests, was that Apple had “surreptitiously created artificial demand” for new iPhones from consumers who mistakenly thought their phones were in need of replacement due to poor performance. To put out the fire, Apple, in January 2018, offered battery replacements at dramatically reduced prices for certain iPhone users.
Setting the scene a bit further, the lawsuit explains that though Apple has enjoyed unprecedented geographic reach for its products, it sees substantial competition in China, its highest growth market. The case goes on to say that while Apple’s sales revenues have grown in China since even prior to the released of its new iPhones, Chinese smartphone makers have encroached on its territory with “scores of much lower priced smartphones with greater advancements,” which, at the end of the day, affects Apple’s leverage in pricing its products.
Also affecting Apple’s overseas power are billions in tariffs on Chinese products imposed by the Trump administration between April and September 2018, the lawsuit goes on. It was during this time, the case says, that Apple released its pricey new iPhone models—the XR, XS and XS Max—all while Chinese smartphone makers continued to cut at Apple’s market share in the country. Put simply, the high-priced new iPhones, strength of the U.S. dollar and slumping Chinese economy allegedly “placed the iPhone out of reach of many Chinese consumers,” who the case notes had access to a number of less expensive yet technologically comparable smartphones.
In November 2018, Apple, according to the lawsuit, issued to shareholders a series of misleading statements in which it knew yet failed to disclose—or deliberately disregarded—that:
- The trade war between the U.S. and China had harmed both demand for iPhones and Apple’s pricing power in greater China, one of Apple’s most important markets;
- The rate at which Apple customers were replacing batteries in older iPhones as opposed to buying news ones hurt the company’s sales growth;
- As a result of sluggish demand, Apple had cut down production orders from suppliers for 2018 iPhone models, and slashed prices to reduce inventory;
- Information concerning iPhone unit sales and that of other hardware was material to investors and the company’s financial health, and the move to withhold unit sale numbers was “designed to and would mask declines in unit sales” of Apple’s flagship product; and
- As a result of all of the above, Apple’s 1Q19 revenue outlook and statements about demand for iPhones were misleading given that the company’s business metrics and financial prospects “were not as strong as [the] defendants had led the market to believe.
Apple’s mid-point first-quarter 2019 revenue guidance released on November 1, 2018, was $1.9 billion lower than what the market expected, the lawsuit states, arguing that Apple’s statements during the relevant time period served to prop up the market price of its stock. After the close of trading on January 2, 2019, Cook reportedly announced that Apple would, for the first time during his tenure, miss its public revenue projections. News of this revelation caused Apple stock to plunge more than $15 per share, according to the complaint.
The lawsuit can be read in full below.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.