Account Control Technology Accused of FDCPA Violations
by Erin Shaak
Last Updated on May 8, 2018
Pinyuk v. Account Control Technology, Inc.
Filed: August 26, 2017 ◆§ 1:17-cv-05058
Account Control Technology, Inc. is facing a proposed class action lawsuit that claims it violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by failing to clearly identify a consumer’s creditor.
New York
Account Control Technology, Inc. is facing a proposed class action lawsuit that claims it violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by failing to clearly identify a consumer’s creditor. The debt collector allegedly sent the plaintiff a letter that named “CUNY – COLLEGE OF STATEN ISLAND W/CC” but neglected to indicate whether the school was the plaintiff’s “original creditor,” “current creditor,” or “creditor to whom the debt is owed.”
“Merely naming the creditor without specifically identifying the entity as the current creditor to whom the debt is owed is not sufficient to comply with [the FDCPA],” the lawsuit reads.
The complaint then takes issue with Account Control Technology's alleged attempt to impose a collection fee of $343.86, which the case says is the defendant’s “anticipated compensation” and, therefore, cannot legally be collected until after the debt collector has received payment from the plaintiff.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Did you know there's usually nothing you need to do to join, sign up for, or add your name to new class action lawsuits when they're initially filed?
Read more here: How Do I Join a Class Action Lawsuit?
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.