‘A Simple Case of Consumer Deception’: Class Action Filed Over Costco Battery Replacement Warranties [UPDATE]
Last Updated on September 25, 2023
Skrandel v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Filed: May 7, 2021 ◆§ 9:21-cv-80826
A proposed class action alleges the “free” battery replacement warranty sold by Costco for Interstate-branded car batteries does not work as consumers believe it will.
Florida
September 22, 2023 – Costco Battery Replacement Lawsuit Settled for $2.4 Million
Costco has agreed to settle the proposed class action detailed on this page for more than $2.4 million.
Don’t miss out on settlement news like this. Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter.
Court documents state that the deal, which U.S. District Judge Bruce E. Reinhart preliminarily approved on September 12, represents an “excellent result” for covered class members as it offers a potential recovery of “approximately 100% of their total likely recoverable damages.”
Consumers covered by the settlement include all current and former Costco members who returned and replaced an Interstate battery under warranty between May 7, 2016 and June 30, 2023 at a Costco warehouse located in the United States.
As part of the settlement, Costco has agreed to pay $1,143,728.15 to refund class members who meet the following criteria for the full amount they spent out of pocket for their replacement Interstate battery, based on the retailer’s records:
“(a) the return transaction occurred at least 30 or more days after their original purchase transaction; (b) the replacement transaction occurred within 30 days of their return transaction; and (c) there are two or fewer Interstate Battery return transactions.”
Members of this “matched replacement transaction” class do not need to do anything to receive compensation, as they will automatically receive a cash payment by paper check or electronically.
Costco has also agreed to pay a maximum of $1,259,276.33 to provide a full refund to class members who meet either of the following sets of criteria with respect to their Interstate battery transactions, based on the retailer’s records:
- (a) the return transaction occurred at least 30 days or more after their original purchase transaction; (b) the replacement transaction occurred within 30 days of their return transaction; and (c) there were three or more Interstate Battery return transactions; or
- (a) the return transaction occurred within 30 days of the original purchase transaction; or (b) the replacement transaction occurred more than 30 days after their return transactions.
Members of this "unmatched replacement transaction” settlement class can file a claim when the official settlement website—BatteryWarrantyClassAction.com—goes live. ClassAction.org will update this page when the settlement website goes live, so be sure to check back often.
Per the settlement documents, attorneys fees will be paid separately from the amounts Costco has agreed to pay for the matched replacement transaction and unmatched replacement transaction classes of consumers.
Those covered by the deal are expected to receive direct notice of the settlement via email or mail within roughly 30 days of preliminary approval, settlement documents say.
A final approval hearing for this settlement is set to take place on February 29, 2024.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
May 26, 2023 – Settlement Reached in Costco Battery Replacement Warranty Lawsuit
The parties in the proposed class action lawsuit outlined on this page have reached a settlement agreement and are now in negotiations to determine how the deal will be administered, among other details.
Though an early attempt at mediation failed in December 2021, the parties jointly submitted a three-page notice on May 12, 2023 informing the court that they had agreed on the “material terms of a classwide [sic] settlement.” In the notice, the parties requested additional time to “continue to negotiate a resolution in good faith.”
The same day, United States District Judge Aileen M. Cannon issued an order granting the parties’ request and scheduling a status conference for May 30.
No details are available yet about the settlement terms.
Don’t miss out on settlement news like this. Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
A proposed class action alleges the “free” battery replacement warranty sold by Costco for Interstate-branded car batteries does not work as consumers believe it will.
The 27-page lawsuit alleges that although consumers believe Costco’s 36- or 42-month battery replacement warranty is good for the no-additional-cost replacement of an Interstate battery in the event the product is defective, the warranty, unbeknownst to buyers, actually comes with an additional price increase for the replacement battery.
“In other words, Costco’s advertised Free Replacement Warranty for the Interstate Batteries is not free at all, but instead, costs consumers the difference in the original purchase price of their Interstate Batteries and the increased price of the replacement batteries Costco requires consumers to purchase,” the case, filed in Florida federal court, claims.
According to the lawsuit, Costco’s “scheme” pertaining to Interstate battery warranties is deceptive to consumers in that they expect to receive a replacement battery at no extra cost or, at the very least, have their purchase price for the original product refunded and then be charged the same price for the replacement battery. Costco’s failure to honor its free replacement warranties for Interstate batteries and/or its failure to disclose to customers that they must pay the difference in the original purchase price and the increased price of a replacement battery amounts to an unfair and deceptive trade practice, the complaint alleges.
“Costco’s failure to honor the Free Replacement Warranty also constitutes a breach of warranty and a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and Costco has been unjustly enriched by its conduct,” the suit contends.
Per the lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has long been concerned with the use of the term “free” by businesses in marketing or promotional materials, in part because the word “can easily lead to deception.” The FTC, for more than 45 years, has had guidance on the use of the word “free” that, the suit argues, makes clear that the agency forbids entities like Costco from charging customers for a purportedly “free replacement” battery. According to the case, nearly every state consumer protection law, including Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Business Practices Act, expressly provides that courts are to give due consideration and weight to the FTC’s interpretation of the Federal Trade Commission Act as it pertains to the term “free.”
Per the lawsuit, the labels of Costco’s Interstate batteries, from 2014 until around 2019, depicted a “free replacement” representation, which the retailer referred to as a “warranty” on the batteries’ price tags. During that time period, the case says, Costco “did not limit or qualify the Free Replacement Warranty in any way” for the Interstate batteries, or make any disclosure to consumers about any terms or conditions that applied to the free replacement warranty:
“A reasonable consumer purchasing an Interstate Battery would expect to receive a replacement battery for free if his or her Interstate Battery became defective within 36/42 months of purchase, and certainly would not expect to have to pay out of pocket any additional amount to receive the battery replacement. That is what ‘free’ means, as common-sense dictates, and as the FTC has made clear.”
Costco, contrary to the expectations of reasonable consumers and without notice, has instead charged Interstate battery buyers an additional cost when they attempt to replace their battery within the warranty period, the lawsuit alleges. Even worse, consumers who buy Interstate batteries are not aware that they will have to pay out-of-pocket for an in-warranty replacement until after they bring their defective battery into Costco, the complaint claims.
The lawsuit looks to represent all persons or entities in the United States who purchased an Interstate Battery at a Costco and were not provided with a free replacement battery when their Interstate Battery became defective. The suit similarly looks to cover a “subclass” comprised of persons and entities in Florida who fit the same criteria.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.