Bank of America Charges Secret Inbound Wire Transfer Fees, Class Action Says [UPDATE]
Last Updated on May 2, 2024
Aseltine v. Bank of America, N.A.
Filed: March 8, 2023 ◆§ 3:23-cv-00235
A class action lawsuit claims Bank of America has concealed that it charges a $15 fee when a personal accountholder receives wired funds into their account.
North Carolina
May 2, 2024 – Bank of America Agrees to Settle Wire Transfer Fee Lawsuit
Bank of America has agreed to settle the proposed class action lawsuit detailed on this page.
Are you owed unclaimed settlement money? Check out our class action rebates page full of open class action settlements.
In a notice filed on April 11, 2024, Bank of America and the plaintiff informed the court that they reached an agreement in principle to resolve their dispute on a class-wide basis. No other details of the apparent settlement are available at this time, but the court has ordered the parties to file a motion for preliminary approval of the deal by May 24, 2024.
ClassAction.org will update this page if and when more information becomes available, so be sure to check back often.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
A proposed class action lawsuit claims Bank of America has concealed that it charges a $15 fee when a personal accountholder receives wired funds into their account.
Want to stay in the loop on class actions that matter to you? Sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
The 22-page lawsuit says that despite the bank’s contractual promise to disclose all fees, it has misled accountholders and secretly “tacked on” these incoming wire transfer charges. Per the case, these so-called “junk” fees are “unavoidable” and “deducted directly from consumer accounts without consent or notice.”
The suit shares that although Bank of America promises to "list[] the fees associated with [an] account and ways to avoid them when applicable,” none of its account documents indicate the existence of an incoming wire transfer fee or an associated charge amount, as required by federal law.
Instead of disclosing the details of the fee at issue, Bank of America “coyly” leaves it up to consumers to find out more information by speaking with a banker, the case claims. In its “Personal Schedule of Fees” document, the defendant states that it “may change the fees for wire transfers and drafts at any time” and suggests that consumers “[visit] a financial center or call us … for current fees,” the complaint relays.
Further, BoA’s “Online Banking Agreement,” which apparently provides an “all-inclusive list of fees” for every type of wire transaction, “tellingly” fails to mention a charge for incoming wire transfers, the filing contends.
“Bank of America's total exclusion of incoming wire transfers from its supposedly all-inclusive fee chart must mean one thing: there will be no fees on incoming wire transfers,” the lawsuit argues.
According to the suit, accountholders are “shocked” to learn that, without warning, they have been charged this “hefty” fee after receiving a wire deposit. In fact, the charge at issue is “especially problematic” because consumers play no part in receiving inbound transfers, which is why many banks charge no such incoming wire fee, the case explains.
“Because [the fees at issue] are a major source of income for Bank of America; because consumers assessed such fees have no control over them; and because Bank of America has hoped consumers will not notice such fees when they receive wires … Bank of America has engaged in an effort to obscure and hide the presence and amount of its Incoming Wire Transfer Fees.”
The plaintiff, a California resident and personal accountholder, received an inbound wire transfer in October 2022, the complaint says. The man was surprised to learn that, despite Bank of America’s contractual promises, he was charged $15 for the transaction without notice or consent, the filing shares.
The lawsuit looks to represent any Bank of America personal accountholders in the United States who were charged incoming wire transfer fees during the applicable statute of limitations period.
Get class action lawsuit news sent to your inbox – sign up for ClassAction.org’s free weekly newsletter here.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuits
Women who developed ovarian or uterine cancer after using hair relaxers such as Dark & Lovely and Motions may now have an opportunity to take legal action.
Read more here: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits
Stay Current
Sign Up For
Our Newsletter
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
Before commenting, please review our comment policy.